![]() |
The Global Invasive Species Team | ![]() |
|
Global Invasive Species Team listserve digest #129 Tue Sep 07 2004 - 17:38:24 PDT --CONTENTS-- 1. Ehrharta species distributions (Nationwide, USA) 2. National Park System weed tracking (California and NE USA) 3. Deep-rooted sedge management information (Southeastern states, USA) 4. Gallery of Pests on-line! (North America) 5. Syringa vulgaris control (Wisconsin, USA) 6. Salvinia in Virginia (Virginia, USA) 7. Invasives meetings (Global, Planet Earth) 8. Detection alert: Cardamine impatiens (Nationwide, USA) 9. PTI 2005 Request for proposals (Nationwide, USA) 10. Weed ID cards (Nationwide, USA) 11. Literature reviews (Global, Planet Earth) --------------------------------------- 1. Ehrharta species distributions (Nationwide, USA) From: Mark Frey (runcator(at)yahoo.com) I am compiling information on Ehrharta erecta (and hopefully E. calycina and E. longifolia) and would appreciate information on its distribution. According to hear.org, Ehrharta erecta occurs in Hawaii on Maui. The web site at plants.usda.gov lists it throughout the San Francisco Bay Area, and in San Diego, Los Angeles, Ventura, and Santa Barbara counties in southern California. Do you know of it anywhere else? If you any other information about its ecology or control I would appreciate that too. --------------------------------------- 2. National Park System weed tracking (California and NE USA) From: Jennifer Sunderland (jsunderl(at)cnr.colostate.edu) The National Park Service Ecosystem Restoration Program is sponsoring an initial effort in California and the northeastern United States to develop a database of restoration techniques related to alien plant invasions. We would like to know what techniques you are testing to restore native plant communities after weed control, and what you have learned. Although local information systems are the basis for local decision making, the knowledge of practitioners only rarely reaches broad audiences through professional research or trade journals. We intend to collect and organize this information so that it is accessible to land managers. Please click on http://www.nrel.colostate.edu/~jsunderl/ to respond to the posted questions. If you would rather relay your experiences via phone or in person please call me at (970) 231-9069. --------------------------------------- 3. Deep-rooted sedge management information (Southeastern states, USA) From: Mandy Tu (imtu(at)tnc.org) I recently witnessed several new infestations of deep-rooted sedge (Cyperus entrerianus) at two TNC preserves and a National Wildlife Refuge in coastal Texas. The fine preserve managers at these sites are now developing a research project to determine best management practices for this species (including combinations of mowing, fire and herbicide), which is apparently present in populations from Texas to Florida. Do you have any information or experience managing deep-rooted sedge? To see photos, current distribution and a weed alert (from Weed Technology) about deep-rooted sedge, click on the urls below. http://www.invasive.org/eastern/species/10954.html http://www.valdosta.edu/~rcarter/research/cypentr.htm --------------------------------------- 4. Gallery of Pests on-line! (North America) From: Barry Rice (bamrice(at)ucdavis.edu) We are pleased as can be to announce a new "Gallery of Pests" on our web site. You have no doubt heard about the usual "bad bugs" like gypsy moth, hemlock woolly adelgid, sudden oak death, etc., that are damaging so many of our forests. But it can be quite difficult to understand which are which, and also what invaders you should be concerned about in your own forests. Now there is a place you can go to learn about these "bad bugs" (really a combination of various arthropods and pathogens). Faith Campbell wrote up a series of reviews, and we have them on-line, fully illustrated, for your edification. We even have a regional listing of these pests and pathogens, so you can see which ones are of particular concern for you in your region. See: http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/gallery.html --------------------------------------- 5. Syringa vulgaris control (Wisconsin, USA) From: Jay Walters (jay.walters(at)dnr.state.wi.us) I am looking for anyone with information on controlling Lilac (Syringa vulgaris). We have an infestation about 1 acre in size and are looking for anyone with information on controlling this species. --------------------------------------- 6. Salvinia in Virginia (Virginia, USA) From: Curtis Hutto (curtis.hutto(at)dcr.virginia.gov) I just wanted to let you all know that our botanists have discovered a population of Salvinia molesta at a small pond in Shenandoah County, Virginia. This is in northern VA at the northern end of the Shenandoah Valley. The pond is small, probably less than 1/4 acre. This is the only known population in VA to my knowledge. It is located on private land, and we are currently in the process of acquiring permission to access the property for control efforts. I am not sure if the population can sustain itself over the winter, but I don't want to sit back and wait either. --------------------------------------- 7. Invasives meetings (Global, Planet Earth) From: Barry Rice (bamrice(at)ucdavis.edu) A spate of Autumn invasives meetings approach. For example, California and Connecticut will both be hosting meetings in the first week of October! For more information on these meetings, look at our web site calendar at: http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/meetings.html --------------------------------------- 8. Detection alert: Linaria dalmatica in Alaska (Nationwide, USA) From: Barry Rice (bamrice(at)ucdavis.edu) NatureServe reports on a recent listserve notice that Linaria dalmatica has been detected in Alaska by Bruce Bennett. Bruce wrote: This summer on July 9th, I collected Linaria dalmatica from along the shoulder of the Alaska Highway west of Watson Lake Yukon Territory along the Rancheria River 60.14118405N -130.23077353W. I only found one plant; however it had over wintered at this site, since there were the remains of last year's flowering stalk. I subsequently collected this plant so hopefully there aren't any others. I believe this is the first record of this invasive species from north of 60 degrees although the smaller Linaria vulgaris is quite common (and spreading) in most Yukon communities. --------------------------------------- 9. PTI 2005 Request for proposals (Nationwide, USA) From: Jonathan Mawdsley (jonathan.mawdsley(at)nfwf.org) The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) is pleased to announce a Request for Proposals for the 2005 Pulling Together Initiative (PTI) grant program. This grant program provides modest support to local community partnerships working to control invasive and noxious weeds. For more information about this grant program, including information about current program priorities, instructions for applicants, and application deadlines, please visit our website, http://www.nfwf.org/programs/pti.htm Please note, application procedures have changed substantially from previous years of this grant program. Applications are now being accepted through the Foundation's online application system. Preproposals will need to be submitted online no later than COB on October 29th, 2004. Please visit our website for more details. If, after reviewing the web materials, you have any questions about PTI, please feel free to contact myself or our grants administrator, Ellen Lippincott for clarification. --------------------------------------- 10. Weed ID cards (Nationwide, USA) From: Mary McFadzen (mmcfadzen(at)montana.edu) The Center for Invasive Plant Management has just produced identification cards of four weed species to aid in your early detection efforts. The front sides of these 4"x7" rack cards show the entire plant. The back sides contain information on why someone should get to know this weed, how to identify it (three characteristics of the species are identified on a photograph), and where to report sightings (includes space to insert contact information). The cards, which cost $1 for 15 cards, can be viewed in a PDF and ordered on our web page. The cards are the same four species as our weed models: Dalmatian toadflax, leafy spurge, spotted knapweed, and yellow starthistle. Follow the link on our home page under What's new? or go to "Products and Publications" on the side bar. http://www.weedcenter.org/ --------------------------------------- 11. Literature reviews (Global, Planet Earth) From: John Randall (jarandall(at)ucdavis.edu) Padilla, D.K. and S.L. Williams. 2004. Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as a source of invasive species in aquatic systems. Frontiers in Ecology 2(3): 131-138. The authors found that one third of the world's worst aquatic invasive species are aquarium or ornamental aquatic species. Over 150 species of animals, plants and microbes (the majority of them freshwater fish), that have invaded natural ecosystems are known to have come from aquariums and aquatic ornamental culture. Trade in these organisms is a $25 billion dollar worldwide business which continues to grow rapidly, and even now the United Nations promotes ornamental fish culture and harvest as a pathway to environmentally sustainable development. Thus, introductions of aquatic invaders by these pathways continue to pose severe threats to aquatic systems across the globe. The authors advocate use of economic analyses to resolve conflicts between sustainable development projects involving aquaculture and trade in aquatic species and the threats of release of aquatic invaders that they pose. They also state that collaboration with the industry will be essential for success in educating buyers and sellers, certifying stock and preventing species from being released. Rogers, W.E. and E. Siemann. 2004. Invasive ecotypes tolerate herbivory more effectively than native ecotypes of Chinese tallow. Journal of Applied Ecology 41(3): 561-570. Siemann, E. and W.E. Rogers. 2003. Increased competitive ability of an invasive tree may be limited by an invasive beetle. Ecological Applications 13(6): 1503-1507. Chinese tallow trees collected in Asia, where they are native, and Chinese tallow gathered in Texas where the species was introduced over 200 years ago, were planted in common gardens in Texas and Hawaii. The fast-growing, poorly-defended-against-herbivores Texas genotype grew significantly larger than the Asian genotype in the Texas common garden where herbivory on this species is uniformly low. In contrast, the slower growing, better-defended Asian genotype grew significantly larger in the common garden in Hawaii where Chinese tallow is not native but where an Asian herbivore that feeds on it (the Chinese rose beetle, Adoretus sinicus) is common. These results support the "evolution of increased competitive ability" hypothesis (EICA) which proposes that invasive plants thrive in their introduced ranges because they evolve to shift resources away from defense against herbivores, and towards increased growth rates. Other observations and experiments have yielded mixed results for the EICA hypotheses, providing support in some cases and failing to do so in others. Overall this may be evidence that some plant species such as Chinese tallow do indeed evolve to become more competitive and so more invasive in their introduced ranges, while other species that do not evolve increased competitive ability nonetheless become invasive. Rogers, W.E. and E. Siemann. 2004. Invasive ecotypes tolerate herbivory more effectively than native ecotypes of Chinese tallow. Journal of Applied Ecology 41(3): 561-570. The title is summary enough for this companion to the article described above. Garcia-Rossi, D., N. Rank and D.R. Strong. 2003. Potential for self-defeating biological control? Variation in herbivore vulnerability among invasive Spartina genotypes. Ecological Applications 13(6): 1640-1649. Populations of Atlantic saltmarsh cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) in both Washington state's Willapa Bay and California's San Francisco Bay were studied. Both populations are fed upon by a species of plant-hopper that specializes in cordgrasses. The Washington Spartina population was found to contain genotypes which varied more in their ability to resist the planthopper than did genotypes from California. Among the Washington population, some genotypes suffered >50% shoot death while other genotypes suffered no loss of shoots when exposed to the plant-hopper. The authors argue that the presence of a tolerant Spartina genotype in Washington does not bode well for the successful biocontrol of Spartina around Willapa Bay where the plant-hopper, Prokelisia marginata, was recently released. They predict that the plant-hopper may at first reduce the abundance of Spartina by rapidly building up populations on and killing the susceptible gentotypes, but that over time the tolerant genotype will spread back into these areas unless it is quickly controlled with herbicides and mechanical methods. Yandoc, C.B. R. Charudattan and D.G. Shilling. 2004. Suppression of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) by a herbicidal fungus and plant competition. Weed Science 52: 649-653. This study indicates that cogongrass may be successfully controlled by combining applications of the fungus Bipolaris sacchari as a bioherbicide with competition from a desirable grass. Cogongrass suffered 64% reduction in fresh weight and 74% reduction in numbers of rhizomes after application of the fungal spores while the "desirable" (but non-native) competitor used in the experiments, bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum v. saurae), suffered only slight damage and recovered quickly. Although bahiagrass is not native to the southeastern US where this work was carried out, it is generally considered relatively non-aggressive, and while tenacious where it had been planted and well-established in pastures that are now being restored to native vegetation, it does not generally spread into native vegetation. |
||||||